Adapted from: Manley, P. 2008. Biodiversity and Climate Change. (May 20, 2008). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Climate Change Resource Center. http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/topics/biodiversity.shtml
Biological diversity is essential to maintaining ecosystem processes and services. Climate change poses a significant threat to biological diversity (Parmesan and Yohe 2003). Before climate change became an acknowledged threat, biological diversity was considered at risk at regional to global scales in response to many human stressors, especially land use. Losses of biological diversity during the past 100 years are historically unprecedented. Land use change, nitrogen deposition, and invasive species pose risks to global biodiversity along with atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and climate change (Sala et al. 2000). Thus climate change represents an additional source of stress on an already at-risk pillar of ecosystem sustainability.
Temperature and precipitation are predicted to change, and many questions exist about the challenges that these climate changes may pose to biological diversity. Some research suggests that climate change poses an even greater threat to biological diversity than land use in some ecosystems (Sala et al. 2000, Thomas et al. 2004). Species respond to environmental change according to their habitat needs, competitive abilities, and physiological tolerances. Although increases in richness are predicted for some areas (cool areas that are predicted to warm) and species (such as some reptiles) (Currie 2001), overall biological diversity is expected to decline precipitously. Cumulative effects of climate change and land use are difficult to assess and separate.
Global and regional climate models project climate warming, with projected increases in average temperatures as well as higher minimum and maximum temperatures. Projections for regional changes in precipitation include changes in amount, timing, intensity, and form (rain vs. snow). Warmer air holds more moisture, so rising temperatures increase the risk of drought from higher evaporation rates even as high temperatures increase the likelihood of extreme precipitation events that can lead to floods (Trenberth et al. 2007). In addition, projected increases in nitrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2) will have different effects on different species.
Climate change will have the greatest proportional effects on biodiversity in biomes with extreme climates. In other words, the changes expected – increases in temperature, nitrogen, and atmospheric CO2 along with changes in precipitation – are likely to have the greatest proportional effects in areas where these elements are most limiting (Sala et al. 2000). Higher latitudes and elevations are where these primary effects are expected to be most marked (Currie 2001, Root et al. 2003, Hampe and Petit 2005). Secondary effects of biotic exchange – defined as the deliberate or accidental introduction of plants and animals to an ecosystem – are likely to affect many areas, particularly those that have lower diversity and higher isolation, such as the Mediterranean and grassland ecosystems (Fig. 1, Sala et al. 2000).
The most significant effects of climate change on species richness in the conterminous United States are expected to be in response to increases in summer temperatures (Currie 2001). Theoretically, ecological communities could move up in elevation and latitude (Walther et al. 2002), however, successful migrations will depend on the rate of climate change relative to essential habitat needs and key community interactions. More likely to happen is existing communities will become decoupled, with some species able to track favorable climate envelopes, while others will lag behind (Midgley et al. 2002). Species most at risk of climate change are those with small geographic ranges (e.g., local endemics), narrow physiological tolerances, limited dispersal abilities, highly specific habitat associations, strong interspecific dependencies, and low genetic diversity, as well as those that have recently experienced population declines (Midgley et al. 2002).
The likely result will be the extinction of many species, reduced biological diversity, and changes in the composition of remaining communities. The coming temperature increases are expected to leave 18 to 35 percent of all species “committed to extinction” by 2050. Thomas and colleagues (2004) calculated this range by matching projections for shrinking habitat (using three different climate change scenarios) with expected species diversity based on the species-area curve. This well-established curve (Fig. 2) finds that the number of species declines as area decreases, with area in this case being area of suitable habitat based on existing species distribution.
Resulting communities are expected to contain species that are able to profit by altered climatic conditions (i.e., species that invade original communities and species that can tolerate energetic limits imposed by climatic conditions) (Currie 2001). Mediterranean and grassland ecosystems are expected to be particularly vulnerable to invasives because of their moderate diversity and relative ecological isolation, whereas northern temperate forests have relatively low vulnerability to invasives (Sala et al. 2000). Reductions in biological diversity in existing communities are likely to diminish the ecosystem services and resilience of those communities to environmental stressors by reducing their functional redundancy (Kremen 2005, Loreau et al. 2001, Reich et al. 2004).
Major uncertainties remain regarding the fate of biological diversity and what options exist for adaptation and mitigation (Thomas et al. 2004). Species extinctions are expected to lag behind climate changes, particularly in longer-lived species. The composite effects of climate change and land use change are unknown, and at worst could be multiplicative. It is also difficult to predict the competitive and adaptive abilities of species in areas with no current ecological analog. Finally, effects on the genetic diversity and adaptability of species are likely to be significant (Hampe and Petit 2005) but are largely unknown (Parmesan and Yohe 2003).
For more on Biodiversity and Climate Change:
- Wildlife Concerns and Climate Change
- Bird Diversity and Climate Change
- Amphibian and Reptile Diversity and Climate Change
- Biodiversity of Trees: Local Seed Banks and Climate Change
Adapted by Melanie Lenart, University of Arizona
Currie D.J. 2001. Projected effects of climate change on patterns of vertebrate and tree species richness in the conterminous United States. Ecosystems. 4: 216-225.
Hampe A., and R.J. Petit. 2003. Conserving biological diversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecology Letters. 8: 461-467.
Kremen C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters. 8: 468-479.
Loreau M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J.P Grime, A. Hector, D.U. Hooper, M.A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman, and D.A. Wardle. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 294(5543): 804–808.
Midgley G.F., L. Hannah, D. Millar, M.C. Rutherford, and L.W. Powrie. 2002. Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 11: 445-451.
Parmesan C., and G. Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 421:37-42.
Reich P.B., D. Tilman, S. Naeem, D.S. Ellsworth, J. Knops, J. Craine, D. Wedin, and J. Trost. 2004. Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 101(27): 10101-10106.
Root T.L., J.T. Price, K.R. Hall, S.H. Schneider, C. Rosenzweig, and J.A. Pounds. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 421: 57-60.
Sala O.E., F.S. Chapin III, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, M. Walker, and D.H. Wall. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 287: 1770-1774.
Thomas C.D., A. Cameron, R.E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L.J. Beaumont, Y.C. Collingham, B.F.N. Erasmus. M. Ferreira de Siquiera, A. Grainger, L. Hannah, L. Hughes, B. Huntley, A.S. van Jaarsveld, G.F. Midgley, L. Miles, M.A. Ortega-Huerta, A. Townsend Peterson, O.L. Phillips, and S.E. Williams. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature. 427: 145-148.
Trenberth, K.E., P.D. Jones, P. Ambenje, R. Bojariu, D. Easterling, A. Klein Tank, D. Parker, F. Rahimzadeh, J.A. Renwick, M. Rusticucci, B. Soden and P. Zhai, 2007. Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change. In: Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Available online at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch3.html
Walther, G-R. E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee, J. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 416: 389-395.
- Forest Service Climate Change Resource Center
- The Nature Conservancy: Climate Impacts
- The University of California, Berkley: The Grinnell Resurvey Project at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
Related to Biodiversity and Climate: